Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Le Lunette Mondello

V.le Regina Elena, 1/2

90151 Palermo PA

Italy

by Beau Cadiyo

On Sunday, we had a Christmas party.  One of our friends brought a date, an artist from London who was visiting Edinburgh for the week, and we three got to talking - about life, love, kids, careers, politics.  At one point, I told her that my wife and I were married on our third date.  "Wow.  Are you happy?" she asked.  

People ask this question of themselves and others, directly or indirectly, enough that it can often be safely deflected.  Here, though, something about her question, as well as my state of mind over the last year, made me think about it closely.  I thought: am I happy?  What is happiness?  Does it actually matter?  Because the context of her question - just after me revealing a fact about my marriage - was important: happiness in a relationship when you are young, or the relationship is new, has a special definition: it is all excitement all the time, exploring the mind and body of another person, dates and drinks and late nights and early mornings.  Ten years into a marriage, with a mortgage and investments and kids and common friends, one might understand why JFK said it wasn't the kill, it was the hunt.  But is that happiness?  Can that level of passion be sustained?  I seriously doubt it; hunting might be fun, but a life of hunting without killing doesn't leave much time for meals.  

When she asked, I instantly went through a partial inventory of my exes: might I have been happier with them?  The Serbian beauty queen, a refugee traumatized by civil war, who used to accidentally send abusive messages to me that were intended for her siblings, and forced her older sister to wipe her butt after she shat because that's what they did as children: I was miserable with her, and the two years I spent in her orbit were such a complete waste of life that, when she later started dating someone else, his friends asked me to talk to him to convince him to break up with her.  The nice but simple girl from Indiana who was extraordinarily uncomplicated: wholesome, but absurdly dull, to the point that her conversations revolved around food and running and little else.  The cardiologist, who my friends said made the beauty queen look almost kind, creative, and friendly.  The bipolar scientist who decided to go off her medication and try to manage her mind with bulletproof coffee and marathons...the highs were bliss, the lows were suicidal.  

At ten years with any of them, I would have hated every moment of my life.  Thank God that none of them lasted.  

So I first thought: compared to all of my other relationships, my marriage is actually amazing.  It has its problems, of course, but does that make it unhappy?  What would it mean to be "happy" in a relationship?  Could a relationship even be "happy"?  In order: no, I don't know, and no - people can be happy in a relationship, but that is the responsibility of the individuals, not the relationship.  We have something that works for us, and that is, I think, the absolute best result possible.  Social media, or media generally, may present an idealized view of marriage, or relationships, and assume certain things that contribute to happiness, but these are not reality, and taking them as the standard by which to judge my life or happiness is foolish.  

And I thought: when I was young, I interned for a psychologist who edited a pop-psych magazine.  At the time, I thought he was clearly gay, but he had been married to three different women, and was looking for a fourth.  He had done some research, and found that in traditional western marriages, the couple falls in love, gets married, and, over time, their level of contentedness with their partner falls; thus, after a while, some get divorced.  In arranged marriages, though, often the couple starts out unhappy, and, over time, they start to adjust to their partner; at the end of seven years, I think it was, the level of relationship satisfaction is far higher in 'arranged' marriages than in 'chosen' marriages.  There are all sorts of things that this doesn't take into account - the fact that a woman in India might be forced to drink gasoline and then light a match if she tries to leave her marriage, for example - but his theory was that they were more realistic about relationships than most Westerners were.  (He tried to start a television show where a marriage was arranged for him by his friends; I left the internship when he was talking to producers.)  

Could I be "happy" in another relationship?  Depending on the person, probably - and absolutely certainly definitely not with any of the women I dated before.  Would I be?  There is absolutely no way to tell, and it would be absurdly stupid to try to predict, to second-guess, to wish.  And that is part of middle-age - realizing that now, paths are cut off that can never be traversed again.  I recently read Kieran Setiya's "Midlife," a book on how philosophy can help us both understand and address questions that may come up with midlife crises.  Part of youth, or at least my youth, was the tragedy of believing that I had virtually unlimited potential, a vista of horizons that didn't actually exist.  What could stop me from doing everything I wanted to do?  I know that this is part of being young, but it was compounded by being American and, particularly, being Californian; anyone could grow up to become President, and, in Los Angeles at least, I was close enough to sports, movie, and music superstars that greatness in almost any field was always within reach.  But now...it isn't.  It isn't just becoming a "subject" of the King instead of an equal citizen to all, or living in a place that is relatively provincial compared to bigger cities; I'm facing what seems, sometimes, to be increasing irrelevance in the circles I was always part of, in the communities whose membership I took for granted when I was young.  At the same time, with ten years of history, and a mortgage, and investments, and kids, and common friends, and the reality of aging coming closer and closer with every death, circles seem to be closing in on me in every way - mentally, emotionally, physically, socially, spiritually.  The limits of the world are becoming clearer and clearer.  

In The Great Gatsby, at the end, Nick goes to look in the kitchen window at Tom and Daisy.  He sees them and notes that "They weren’t happy...and yet they weren’t unhappy either. There was an unmistakable air of natural intimacy about the picture, and anybody would have said that they were conspiring together."  I used to think that this was part of the tragedy, that they were going to stay together despite their conflicted feelings, and Daisy was going to choose stability over excitement, but I now wonder: was Fitzgerald telling us that this was perhaps the most that we can honestly expect, that they were both clear-headedly evaluating their options and going with the best one, and Jay's dreams of ecstasy were unrealistic and absurd?  Was the cold chicken on the table worth more than a green light he could never grasp for more than a moment before it receded again?  Social media tells us that we should just run a bit faster, stretch out our arms a bit further; a clear-headed view of the world says we should not be happy when we attain our dreams, but be happy with our current situation.  

And, in the end, I love my wife; she is absolutely incredible, and I am so glad to be with her and not someone else.  I'm absurdly happy, and I am sorry that it isn't obvious all the time.  

So I started to answer her, but I was drunk, and a lawyer friend of ours, who I normally can't stand but whose son is a friend of our son, butted in with an inane comment, and I made another drink, and then everyone left and we were left alone in our amazing flat with a fire in the fireplace, two brilliant kids, and plenty of food and drink.  Then there was dinner, bath time, a bit of Pixar, letters, and sleep.  

In our month in Palermo, we got to Mondello beach two or three times a week.  We tried a bunch of the restaurants near the top side - Carolina Bonito, Ganci Mondello, Antica Friggitoria Come Una Volta, Vicius, D2 Daniels, and Roxy Ristofriggitoria - and Le Lunette was, by far, the best of any of them: the arancini were always fresh and warm, the sandwiches rotated and were delicious, and the coffee was strong.  The owner and head chef is often out in front, serving the food and making sure everything is perfect; there is a woman at the till who won't smile at you until your third week, but, at that point, she will start cooing over your children and will serve you ahead of other people, smiling and feigning monolingualism if they huff.  Oh - and their ice cream is good, too.  Really, if a meal here doesn't make you happy, I don't know what will.  

Friday, December 13, 2024

El Perro Negro

St. James Quarter

Edinburgh, EH1 3AE

UK

by Beau Cadiyo

To an American, one of the strangest things about British schools, and the British system, is the complete lack of a wall between church and state.  In Scotland, kids must generally have two public schools to choose from: a normal state school (that has no religious affiliation) and a Catholic school.  Either way, they are going to get a ton of religion thrown at them - while all religions are tolerated, and many religious holidays are celebrated, it is abundantly clear that the Church of England is the official state church and Christian rituals are dominant.  There are no "winter holidays" or "spring break" - Christmas is the reason for the season and its attendent vacations, and the Easter break comes at Easter, which just happens to be in spring.  

This week, all of the kindergarteners at my son's private school participated in the school nativity play.  The reaction of other parents is telling: the British ones get nostalgic about their own participation decades before, and are giddy at the thought that their child may be a king, or a sheep, or even Joseph or Mary.  The foreigners, too, loved it - there were Asian, African, and Middle Eastern parents in the audience with us who hadn't had the same experience but thought it was adorable to see their kids participating in this quaint British tradition, and maybe saw their child's participation as evidence of their having been accepted into British society.  Attending the performance as an American, I was...well, comfortable with it, knowing that my son is getting a healthy dose of skepticism at home, has never believed in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny, and is learning about all sorts of things that would prevent him from slipping down the road of blind belief.  

But seeing five-year-olds pretend to be wise men made me revisit my attitude to religion.  One thing I am  trying to be careful of is not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.  While I am not a strong believer in Christianity (if anything, I have a strong affinity for the Old Gods), I believe that mainstream modern religion has a lot of good in it, and there are a lot of life lessons that are effectively communicated through many of the Good Books.  For example, the virtues - I don't know of any sane person who would say that fortitude is bad, or that we should keep people from being just.  Loving thy neighbor?  Kindness?  Mercy?  All good things to normal people.  

In my son's nativity play, Joseph and Mary go from inn to inn in a foreign land, looking for a place to stay, and every innkeeper turns them away until one lets them sleep in the barn with the animals.  I thought: if an American voter was faced with the option to help these folks, about to birth Jesus, would they tell Herod to build a wall?  Would they say, "Send the man on a bus to New York and the woman to Florida and let them try to find each other"?  Would they want to put Jesus in a retaining cell away from his parents for months on end, then send him "back to where he came from" without them?  I think the answer must be, "Yes, absolutely."  Perhaps it is the experiment in separating Church and State that has led to a situation where the vast majority of American voters would call Jesus a slur, demand identification from Joseph, and say that Mary and her kind should keep her legs closed.  

The question, then: how to transmit these religious virtues to modern American voters?  How to get them to think more about charity and love than Kx Kardashian or how to get another credit card?  

I don't know the answer.  Maybe we need to amend the Constitution to be more in line with traditional Christian values like compassion, respect, humility, honesty, generosity, forgiveness, and self control, and inculcate these values in the citizens.  Maybe we need laws to enforce Matthew 6:5-6, or 19:9, or to encourage Luke 14:12-13 and Matthew 5:44.  

Maybe, too, El Perro Negro needs to rethink their sauce policies.  They have damn good burgers, but charge £1 for a small cup of ketchup.  Maybe they need Keith Lee to visit.  

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Botteghina Caffe' Pitti

 Piazza de' Pitti, 10

50125 Firenze FI

+39 552 143 23


Website


by Beau Cadiyo


Growing up, the Freemasons were never a really big part of my life. I remember that they had a hall off of I-8 in El Cajon, and they occasionally hosted functions there for schools - debate tournaments, Saturday-morning pancake breakfast fundraisers, that sort of thing. They also had a complex in Mission Valley for the "Scottish Rite," which hosted really big events in a giant, 1950s building just off the freeway. I can confidently say that I never knew anything about them whatsoever, positive or negative, growing up.  


Then, in my senior year of college, two things brought them to my attention. First, I visited the Paramour, and the owner explained to me that it was built by a group of "operative and speculative Freemasons" who not only knew how to build huge buildings out of stone that would last through the ages, but also knew the philosophy of space, how to make a room truly beautiful, how buildings could resonate with the soul in ways that we could not fully comprehend with our senses. Then, later in the year, I was sitting in the college dining hall when one of my classmates, Kendra, came up to me and handed me a flier. Had I heard about the cancerous influence that Freemasons had on the world? The way they were infiltrating every branch of every government to further their nefarious designs? How they controlled the international economy, to the point that ordinary people who were not part of their "fraternity" could never get a fair shake? I had not, and I kept my admiration for their physical handiwork to myself; also, the general negative feelings I had for Kendra, and my low level of respect for her intellect, led me to think that if she was against them, then I would probably be for them.


Maybe six months later, I was getting on a bus in Portland, Oregon, and an old man was struggling to get up the steps. I helped him, and after I sat down, he came over and asked if he could sit next to me. We started talking, and I noticed his ring; I asked about it, and he asked if I had ever heard of the Freemasons. I had!?!  Well, gosh, if I was ever interested in joining, I should call him; he gave me his name and phone number, and after I got home that night, I did what he probably didn't expect me to do: I called. He suggested that we meet some evening at his Lodge; he would get more information for me in the meantime. I waited a few days, and called again, but he didn't answer. I probably called two or three more times before the number was cut off.  I always assumed he had died in those few days after I had met him, and with his death that particular door closed.  


September 11 happened, and I got a girlfriend.  Sick of Portland, I moved back down to San Diego and, shortly after, my friend James got in touch. He had graduated in 1998, moved to New York, made a fortune in the stock market in just a few months, and had "retired" to Los Angeles, where he was living the high life, swing dancing at the Roxy, drinking highballs, and dating a string of aspiring starlets and models.  He had something to ask me, something important: had I ever heard of the Freemasons? I had!?!  He was thinking of joining, and wanted my take on the whole thing. I told him that I was interested, too, and we agreed to join our local lodges and compare experiences.


I was living in Pacific Beach at the time, and contacted the Mission Bay Lodge, which turned out to be just around the corner from me. A man named Dick returned my call, and was very friendly; I went down to meet him, and everything seemed great. The only catch: to join, I needed to have been a resident of California for the full preceding year, and I had only just moved back down - the fact that I had grown up there, and never gave up my Californian driver's license, didn't matter in the slightest. I waited my year and got back in touch with them; soon I was waiting in rolled-up pajamas and a rope outside of a heavy wooden door to be initiated, passed, and then raised as a Master Mason. 


It turned out that I was the last Mason that Mission Bay Lodge ever made.  Maybe a month after I became a full member of the lodge, they announced that they were closing. Despite my eager, wide-eyed participation, their membership numbers were falling too fast - I was the youngest member by at least fifty years, and they could muster about eight people for a meeting, tops.  With an average age of 78, our lodge was literally dying out.  It was the same in lodges across the country and around the world; member lists were shrinking and, faced with rising costs and lower revenues, lodges felt forced to "merge" with other lodges to reduce costs and overhead and fill meetings. I was soon a member of the new Old Glory #798 lodge; instead of meeting in Mission Bay, we sold the building and rented a room in the giant Mission Valley Scottish Rite center.  


I was still the youngest member of this new lodge by decades, but that didn’t dim my ardor.  I joined the Scottish Rite, which, in an effort to boost membership numbers, had reduced the core curriculum down to seven lectures; after a single day of classes, I received the "thirty-second degree" as well as the most secret word. I joined the Shriners, which gave me a fez and let me drive around in parades in a tiny car. I started working my way up the lodge ranks. Life took me to Barcelona; I got to participate in Catalan lodges, where, with my thirty-second degree, I was the most senior Freemason in Catalunya, if not all of Spain.  The lodges there had only really started operating after Franco died, and, in the old style, each degree took a minimum of one year to obtain; the highest-ranking Mason in our building was maybe on his twenty-third degree. I still remember showing my visiting card to the secretary of the lodge, who had been a Freemason before I was born and who had been trying to work his way up the ranks ever since and who I outranked by a dozen degrees.  He looked at my face, then the card, and dropped it on the table, muttering "puta madre" before suggesting I sit in an honored seat for the meeting, and be offered the gavel to show them how to run a meeting (which I declined).


Once I got back to the States, and moved to Ohio, my membership in Old Glory came under strain. The secretary of the lodge started sending out racist emails from the lodge email account, complaining about the number of Mexicans in San Diego. I wrote in protest to the leadership, but was told that, as the Secretary had the right to use the email system, and these were his own opinions, and they didn't want to get involved with politics, nothing would be done. I immediately resigned my membership, and approached a couple of lodges in Cleveland to join them instead. One had a young leadership, was alternative and progressive, and was eager to have me join them, while one was much more mature, very conservative, and would deign to have me as a member. In retrospect, I am ashamed to have thought of my career in joining a lodge, but that was what the deciding factor was - the conservative lodge would benefit my life as a lawyer the most, so I applied.


I was a member there for two years. In my third year of law school, they had an event at the Cleveland Schvitz, a men-only Jewish sauna.  They did this two or three times a year; everyone would sit in the steam rooms, take cold plunges, and drink whisky and eat steak and potatoes together in order to promote fraternity and brotherly love.  The whole thing was subsidized by lodge dues.


The lodge used the Schvitz to push for "new members", and we were encouraged to invite men who we thought would be good brethren. I instantly thought of someone to bring: my friend Jason. He had grown up in a single-mother household in Akron, beat the odds to graduate from college, and then went to law school; he was an excellent student, got an offer at a huge firm, and was on the path to immense legal success. He was also interested in the fraternity. 


Oh - and he was black.  


At the end of the otherwise pleasant evening, Jason went to get his jacket, and one of the older lodge members, who had been in the leadership for years and was a prominent doctor in Cleveland, came over and put his hand on my shoulder. "Just to let you know, this is a private club," he said quietly in my ear, "and we don't let people like your friend in." His tone said it all. Revolted, I got up, got my things, and we left. I submitted my resignation from the lodge, which was quietly accepted; none of the brethren were about to rock the boat on this issue but me.  


It seemed that my involvement with Freemasonry had ended, but perhaps three weeks later, I got an email from a guy named Tom, who owned a few donut shops in Cleveland and was a member of a lodge named Halcyon. He and his brothers had somehow heard of my experience at the Schvitz, and they wanted to know: would I be interested in joining a lodge that rejected all of the things I found so abhorrent, and was dedicated to actually embracing people across all lines and boundaries? I went to meet him at one of his donut shops, which was just down the street from my house, and was intrigued: they had a massive lodge building in Ohio City, they existed as the American arm of the Grand Orient de France, and were planning to make Freemasonry a relevant fraternity once again.  


I went to see the lodge, and was blown away. It was a massive stone building that reminded me of what the Paramour would have looked like if it had been an event space instead of a mansion. There were wide stone staircases, immense marble columns, and ornate rooms throughout; the chairs were either velvet or leather, the presentation cases were filled with scrolls and silver, and the paintings all bore the names and likenesses of the industrialists who vied with Rockefeller for preeminence and wealth and whose names had been scattered on buildings and streets across the city.  


So I joined. They gave me keys to the building and told me to use it whenever I wanted, and an old apron from the 1940s, and got me in the leadership line; soon, they asked me if I wanted to be Master of the Lodge, as Tom and the others were busy building out the national organization, and couldn't be bothered with the details of running meetings.  Soon, I had convinced two of my friends, Carl and Orson, to join the lodge as well; they were rapidly promoted to be secretary (Carl) and treasurer (Orson).  Importantly for later, without planning it, the main administrative roles of the lodge were all being performed by me and my friends.  


Writing this all down now, I have to wonder: was I naive?  Was I a sucker?  I look back at the conversations we had, at their behavior and actions, and think: no.  I think they were really planning on doing something big with Freemasonry, but I fucked it all up for them.  


The problem was women. The Grand Orient de France had decided that even if women had historically been excluded from Freemasonry, this was absurd, illogical, and outdated.  As a consequence, they ruled that women should henceforth be admitted to all Grand Orient lodges everywhere, provided that the lodges agreed, and changed their charters to allow it. To me, this was wonderful; I never liked the exclusion, and, as with Jason earlier, I had another perfect, willing candidate.  


Her name was Jessica, and I remember the very first time I met her, in the spring of 2009. I was also heavily involved in a law school fraternity, which was open to both men and women; I decided to host an event at the Lodge for alumni, and Jessica showed up early, before I had a chance to get the drinks out of my car.  She immediately volunteered to help set up, then stayed outside and signed people in - I think she had the genius idea that she could meet everyone first, before they even got in the door.  Either way, she was an amazing help, and we got to talking. We had gone to law school together, but she was a year behind me; again, like Jason, she was an Ohio native, had gotten very good grades, and was going to join a huge firm downtown. After the event, we stayed in touch.


Once the Grand Orient had issued their proclamation about letting women in, I quietly started canvassing the members to propose that we, as a lodge, take advantage of this new French liberality to change our own charter to allow women in.  Outside of my friends, the response was an almost violent “non.”  Each long-standing member I spoke with told me that individually, they had no issue with the idea, but "we have to think of what this would do to the brethren."  Over and over, this was the response I got: in order to admit women, we would need to have a vote to change our charter, and if we called for a vote, we would lose for some vague, unspecified, prejudiced reason.  


So I looked at our charter, and found something interesting.  Generally, a lodge needed to have seven Master Masons as members in order to exist.  However, this new French branch of Masonry was very new in America, so in an effort to grow the fraternity in places where they couldn't get seven Master Masons together, the charter said that the Master of any full lodge could create a "Triangle," or a starter subsidiary lodge, that only needed three members.  Triangles only needed to have one Master Mason and two lower-degree Masons in order to operate, so the standards were lower.  To promote flexibility, triangles operated under independent charters, which the parent lodge did not have any say over; thus, even if a parent lodge did not want to admit women, a subsidiary Triangle could admit women under its own charter.  Any newly-admitted member in a triangle would automatically become full members of the parent lodge; thus, any woman a Triangle admitted would be a full member of the parent lodge.  To reduce bureaucratic red tape, lodges did not vote on setting up triangles; the Master of the Lodge had full authority to create a triangle, and they were not only allowed to set up Triangles - they were actively encouraged to do so.  


And the Master of the most important Lodge in the system who was vested with the power to create these new Triangles was...me.  


We read the writing on the wall; the lodge would never agree to allow women. Seeing this, Carl, Orson and I created a Triangle to do it instead, with Jessica's full involvement.  


The furor was immediate.  I remember standing outside a West Side warehouse in the middle of a Cleveland "lake effect" blizzard on a Saturday in December 2010, talking on my flip phone to Joel, one of our central opponents; realizing the purpose of the triangle, he and everyone else apparently thought that creating the triangle was a violation of the lodge constitution.  I asked him to explain, and said I would gladly rescind what I had done if he could explain what was done incorrectly; he dodged, prevaricated, shouted, but finally had to admit that they had written up a charter that actively encouraged me to do exactly what I had done, and they had nobody but themselves to blame if they didn't like the result.  He ran an investment company, and was not a lawyer; I explained that if he wanted my advice on stopping me, I would be happy to help, but for the time being, I was going to continue on my merry way until they could convince the Master of the Lodge - a notorious asshole, as I was sure he would agree - to hold a vote to change the rules they themselves had written for setting up Triangles.  


Click.  


So we had our Triangle, and this Triangle had three members, and its own independent rules that expressly allowed it to admit women.  One of the duties of a Triangle was to initiate any new brothers who met the Triangle's charter of membership requirements. Let me amend that - brothers or sisters. And so it was late on a Saturday, in a grand hall with an old organ and massive chairs, that Carl, Orson and I donned our regalia and initiated Jessica into our hallowed fraternity as its first-ever female Mason.


Joel and Tom and the others never found out about this.  They DID continue to challenge the existence of the Triangle; we received emails and calls throughout the holidays and into early 2011 trying to convince us to close down the Triangle and submit to their authority.  One thing that we realized was that they were keeping this a secret from the other lodges.  With lodges in New York, Washington, DC, Los Angeles, Chicago, and many other cities, if word got out that the main lodge, the central star in their galaxy, was going rogue, was completely out of their control, then there could be trouble.  What trouble?  I suppose other lodges might try to admit women, or set up Triangles of their own to do so, which they didn’t want, so they seemed to try everything to convince us to shut down while also not making a big fuss over it. It got so bad, and sentiments between our group and theirs became so toxic, that eventually we collectively decided that we needed to get out.  The thing was, we didn’t want to leave without exposing their actions to the wider group.  To do so, however, would risk getting into a very dirty fight, which was not at all what we wanted.  


Until this point, I had never understood a peculiarity of Parliamentary democracies: abstention as a form of protest.  I always heard of parliaments where the Prime Minister was not playing fair so the minority or opposition parties would just abstain from an election - as if not participating somehow increased their power over the matter.  But one day, we were thinking over how we could fight back.  Maybe one of us saw one of the myriad elections that were happening in 2011, and we all realized what we needed to do.  


Secretary Carl was the officer responsible for all official internal and external lodge communications.  Early in the afternoon on a Friday - chosen because we could be out of touch, and none of our opponents would be able to or expected to reach us, and it would totally ruin their weekends as they schemed and plotted - he sent out three short emails to everyone in our lodge, the Masters and Officers of all of the other lodges, and the officers of the Grand Orient de France.  


The first said that Beau, Master of the Cleveland lodge, was resigning, effective immediately, and would not be available for comment.  


The second said that the Orson, Treasurer of the Cleveland lodge, was resigning, effective immediately, and would not be available for comment.   


The third said that Carl, the Secretary of the Cleveland lodge was resigning, effective immediately, and would not be available for comment. 


Nobody - not our antagonists, our allies, or the Grand Orient de France, could reach us to find out what was happening, but oh, how they tried.  The calls came through to my cell phone and work line; our inboxes were inundated, our facebook messages were flooded with one question: “WTF?”  We maintained strict radio silence.  In place of our story, everyone involved in France and America had to ask questions and form theories and rely on the most beautiful of weapons: rumors.  


We had it on good authority that the leader of our opposition, Jeff, was forced to fly to Paris to explain what was happening with his beautiful Mother Lodge.  Why did these three officers, who had been touted as the future of the fraternity, resign?  He...couldn't tell them.  Well, he couldn't without making his side look terrible. So, like Joel, he apparently dodged and hedged and prevaricated. Faced with his evasiveness, and clear lack of control, and fearing some sort of financial misappropriation, the Grand Orient then looked through the accounting books.  Meanwhile, other lodges got wind of what was happening and started resigning en-masse, BCCing us on their communications with Jeff. After a few months, we saw an announcement that the Grand Orient of France was revoking the charters of all of the lodges in America, and would no longer affiliate with any of them.  The French experiment with Freemasonry in America was over, and with it, the Grand Orient of the United States of America.  


In other words, we had accomplished what many people throughout history - Hitler, the Catholic Church, and Kendra of the Dining Hall - had wanted to do, but could not: we destroyed an international Masonic organization.  


All over Jessica, and the opportunity to let women in.  

She was worth it.


We washed our hands of the Masons, but not of each other. All of us continued to become better and better friends; we met weekly, at least, supporting each other emotionally and socially and professionally. And, twelve years later, Jessica came out to Italy to spend her vacation time with us in Florence.


On the penultimate day of her visit, we ate at Botteghina Caffe Pitti, recommended to us by her husband, an outstanding chef and mindful eater.  The porchetta sandwiches were absolutely outstanding - the bread was fresh, the porchetta perfectly cooked and the truffle spread was divine.  We had porchetta sandwiches in other places - in the central market, where the rind was still as tough and chewy as a rubber band, and at the famed I Fratellini, where the pork was over-salted and the bread was so dry it was almost a crouton. Here, the overall balance and contrast between the ingredients, as well as the sheer quality, was a revelation; as her husband said, this may be the single best sandwich I have ever eaten.


I was glad to be able to see her again, and grateful for the opportunity to catch up on each others’ lives, but the most amazing thing was that she got to meet my children - she has meant so much to me over the years, and I have so much respect for her, that I want them to know her, too.  But I am now faced with a challenge: when my kids are old enough to really know her, how can I tell them about the role she played in my life, and of what we did?  How do I communicate to them one of my proudest moments, one of the times I stood up against prejudice and fear and hate and did something big?  How do we learn about our parents' friends, about what they mean to us, and why? Because right now, our friends are just a string of adults occasionally interfering in their days, sometimes buying them presents, telling them jokes, acting oddly and making us act differently. How do we ensure, when they are older, that they know these stories, and that they have the same sort of respect for our friends that we do?


I’m not sure I will ever know the answers. But if anyone has any suggestions, I am all ears. At least we will always have the porchetta.

Wednesday, January 3, 2024

Bread Meats Bread

7-9 North Bridge

Edinburgh, EH1 1SB

by Beau Cadiyo

A friend of mine from high school recently got in touch with me to say that he sometimes checked this blog to see if it was still active, but that it seems to have "gone dark."  

I'm not saying he is a racist, but I am not sure how to finish this sentence.  

The nerve!  I admit, I have taken a very small break from writing here.  I could blame life - an international move, career changes, an expanding family of children beautiful enough to represent various international clothing lines but not so perfect that when they walk down the street they catch the attention of pilots flying at 30,000 feet and cause airplanes to fall from the sky.  But actually, the slowdown happened a long, long time before all of those things came to be.  To wit: ten years ago, I took a job with NPR.  Yes, the very same NPR that all of you liberals love.  On my first day, my boss sat me down and told me that I would have to stop blogging, as I was so opinionated and blunt in my reviews of sandwiches that people would think I was potentially biased, and it was the role of NPR to not be biased.  I, as a presenter, had to be a blank slate, without any interesting facets or personally-held opinions.  

As my maternal grandfather would have said: is this justice?  And why would a state-funded media outlet demand objectivity from its paid mouths?  

But I was young, and needed the money.  Five years of blogging momentum halted almost instantly; my ideas and opinions were shelved, suppressed, held in.  I mean, in 2010, I took a month off and still wrote 71 posts - and then, it went downhill.  

But, like Saddam Hussein, "I can change!"  A decade of no food reviews has left me hungry.  Plus, I run the number one food blog in Ohio.  Or, at least, I used to be number one, and used to be in Ohio.  

So, Mr. Frank Bart Chandler, you are no racist, or, at least, I don't think you are.  I don't know you now - the last time we spoke was in maybe 2000, and life has intervened.  It is interesting to think that our paths have diverged so radically since we grew up together.  I still have a memory of you in the back of a minivan with Francis Kuhwald, maybe coming back from a retreat in eastern San Diego county, and you were listening to The Breeders on a Walkman, both of you singing something - "last splash."  I remember having never heard the song you both loved so much, and being so jealous of you at the time for being able to listen to that song at will, and feeling left out.  Last year, I was playing something for my son - maybe Rage Against The Machine, which also makes me think of you and your mom, when she pulled your CD out of the player and smashed it because of the lyrics "fuck you I won't do what you tell me," when really, maybe it was everything else going on in her life, and I just want to give you both hugs, or maybe I was playing him the Mighty Mighty Bosstones - but then a song came on, and I asked Alexa what it was, and she said it was The Breeders, and I had a flash of such a strong memory, and I thought: "Huh.  I was jealous of them listening to this?"  

And as much as I hate to admit it, this blog has gone dark.  Black.  Noir.  

No longer.  

I do not know what it will turn into.  I DO know that I want to write more, and am committing to writing 52 posts this year, and to discuss my most deeply felt opinions about sandwiches, to delve deeply into nuances of flavor and texture and experience.  I want to get back into the sandwich game.  

Get back into?  Fuck that.  This is so old that it is being written on Blogger.  I fucking started this game.  

I'm back.  

And the Cali Burger at Bread Meats Bread conflicts me.  On the one hand, it is a superior imitation to an In-N-Out burger - at least, I have to assume that they were trying to copy it, and ended up surpassing it.  On the other, I still hate it when people call California "Cali" - it is still the easiest way to tell if the person is not actually from California.  But something about Britain inspires people to put on masks and costumes and act as if they were American.  Walking down the street, one is guaranteed to see a few things: 

  1. A NASA hat, jacket, or t-shirt.  British people are obsessed with NASA.  
  2. A Yankees hat, and probably something related to the Patriots - a shirt, hat, jersey.  They are also obsessed with teams named after a group of people who beat them in a war.  
  3. Something advertising a real US college or university that they have never visited, much less attended.  UCLA, Harvard and Yale are the most popular - there is a store, NEXT, that sells tons of college merchandise from these three places.  I have no idea what the Brits think they are signalling by wearing this, but clearly they want to be American college students.  
  4. Something from a fake US sports organization.  My favorite was the "Mid-Pacific American Baseball Champions Sacramento 1977" shirt a woman was wearing at a bus stop, but there are tons of made-up leagues and events that people wear on their shirts that often don't even make any sense.  
(The good thing is that if you see someone in something from, say, SDSU, or Villanova, or for the Cleveland Cavaliers, it is safe to assume that they are either American or actually know something about the team they are pushing, and it is safe to walk up to them and strike up a conversation.)

So the Brits, actually, just want to look as if they are American.  The Americans, meanwhile, either wear Columbia or REI jackets (everyone here wears North Face or Patagonia - brands that Americans used to have a monopoly on, and used to be a guaranteed signal of tourists, but no longer) or something with a Canadian team on it to act as if they are not American, without realizing that looking less like an actual American and more like a pretend American will make them look British.  

Sigh.  It reminds me, often, of when Stephen Colbert interviewed my former Congresswoman Marcia Fudge and asked her what it was about Ohio that made people want to leave earth.  Maybe we all just want to escape the shame of being ourselves, and we will do what we can to show others we are whatever we are not, so long as it is not us.  

Regardless, friends, Beau Cadiyo is back.  Salve.